Pages Menu
TwitterRss
Categories Menu

Posted by on Jul 6, 2009 in Featured Maps | 1 comment

Featured Map: Possible Surname Regions in Britain

This map is one I created for a working paper I am currently writing. Using surnames from the 1881 census of Great Britain, I have been implementing a measure (the Lasker’s Distance) that establishes the similarity of populations based on their Coefficient of Isonymy. The Lasker’s Distance enables the similarities or differences between populations (in this case those in British Districts) to be thought of in terms of ‘surname space’. Put simply, areas that have more surnames in common can be considered closer together than areas with fewer common surnames. This is useful as it enables a number of analysis techniques to be applied to the resulting distance values. In this case Ward’s Hierarchical Clustering has been applied to produce 15 clusters. The map represents each of these clusters with a unique colour. These results suggest that regions are present in the geography of British surnames. This map should be considered as preliminary as it is yet to undergo academic review.
2001 Surname British Surname Clusters

Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Google Bookmarks
Share on reddit
Bookmark this on Digg
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on LinkedIn

1 Comment

  1. This looks interesting! Is there any relationship between the hues of the colours? (i.e. are the surnames of Devon and Yorkshire related, as they both appear purple-ish on the map?)

    I see also that the Welsh and Scottish area follow their respective national boundaries fairly well, except that the eastern Scottish Borders are more associated with N.E. England than Scotland. Perhaps settling the long running argument that Berwick-upon-Tweed is definitely English.

Post a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>